<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: grep excluding .svn dirs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antoniolorusso.com/2008/05/12/grep-excluding-svn-dirs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antoniolorusso.com/2008/05/12/grep-excluding-svn-dirs/</link>
	<description>About me and what I do :)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:01:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anson MacKerache</title>
		<link>http://antoniolorusso.com/2008/05/12/grep-excluding-svn-dirs/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Anson MacKerache</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antoniolorusso.com/?p=101#comment-431</guid>
		<description>I have a hard time believing that ack could be faster than grep, and there doesn&#039;t seem to be any benchmarks on the project page. I admit, grep can be a little complicated, but IMHO it is the best string matching program available.

Even the fact that ack is advertising as &quot;better than grep&quot; makes me suspect the whole affair.

/rant
 
Thanks for this post, btw!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a hard time believing that ack could be faster than grep, and there doesn&#8217;t seem to be any benchmarks on the project page. I admit, grep can be a little complicated, but IMHO it is the best string matching program available.</p>
<p>Even the fact that ack is advertising as &#8220;better than grep&#8221; makes me suspect the whole affair.</p>
<p>/rant</p>
<p>Thanks for this post, btw!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://antoniolorusso.com/2008/05/12/grep-excluding-svn-dirs/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antoniolorusso.com/?p=101#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Actually, I was wrong again. The --exclude option of grep only excludes files, NOT directories. Grep 2.5.3 added the --exclude-dir option specifically for excluding directories (in which case --exclude-dir=\.svn works); in earlier versions, one needs to use the find command and pipe it to grep (though I never got that to work properly). Best by far, however, is to just use ack instead (see betterthangrep.com). It&#039;s faster, ignores .svn directories by default, and simply requires this statement:  ack [pattern]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I was wrong again. The &#8211;exclude option of grep only excludes files, NOT directories. Grep 2.5.3 added the &#8211;exclude-dir option specifically for excluding directories (in which case &#8211;exclude-dir=\.svn works); in earlier versions, one needs to use the find command and pipe it to grep (though I never got that to work properly). Best by far, however, is to just use ack instead (see betterthangrep.com). It&#8217;s faster, ignores .svn directories by default, and simply requires this statement:  ack [pattern]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antonio lorusso</title>
		<link>http://antoniolorusso.com/2008/05/12/grep-excluding-svn-dirs/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>antonio lorusso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antoniolorusso.com/?p=101#comment-362</guid>
		<description>thanks Andrew, it was a mistake. I fixed the error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks Andrew, it was a mistake. I fixed the error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://antoniolorusso.com/2008/05/12/grep-excluding-svn-dirs/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antoniolorusso.com/?p=101#comment-361</guid>
		<description>This is a great tip, but it seems like the regular expression is strange -- shouldn&#039;t you escape the . (dot) and not the * (asterix)? For me, this is what worked: --exclude=*\.svn*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great tip, but it seems like the regular expression is strange &#8212; shouldn&#8217;t you escape the . (dot) and not the * (asterix)? For me, this is what worked: &#8211;exclude=*\.svn*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesper</title>
		<link>http://antoniolorusso.com/2008/05/12/grep-excluding-svn-dirs/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antoniolorusso.com/?p=101#comment-352</guid>
		<description>Just what I needed. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what I needed. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
